Commit Graph

132 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Giteabot f144521aea
Deprecate query string auth tokens (#28390) (#28430)
Backport #28390 by @jackHay22

## Changes
- Add deprecation warning to `Token` and `AccessToken` authentication
methods in swagger.
- Add deprecation warning header to API response. Example: 
  ```
  HTTP/1.1 200 OK
  ...
  Warning: token and access_token API authentication is deprecated
  ...
  ```
- Add setting `DISABLE_QUERY_AUTH_TOKEN` to reject query string auth
tokens entirely. Default is `false`

## Next steps
- `DISABLE_QUERY_AUTH_TOKEN` should be true in a subsequent release and
the methods should be removed in swagger
- `DISABLE_QUERY_AUTH_TOKEN` should be removed and the implementation of
the auth methods in question should be removed

## Open questions
- Should there be further changes to the swagger documentation?
Deprecation is not yet supported for security definitions (coming in
[OpenAPI Spec version
3.2.0](https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/issues/2506))
- Should the API router logger sanitize urls that use `token` or
`access_token`? (This is obviously an insufficient solution on its own)

Co-authored-by: Jack Hay <jack@allspice.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-12-12 13:45:00 +08:00
Giteabot a8e505a44b
Unify two factor check (#27915) (#27929)
Backport #27915 by @KN4CK3R

Fixes #27819

We have support for two factor logins with the normal web login and with
basic auth. For basic auth the two factor check was implemented at three
different places and you need to know that this check is necessary. This
PR moves the check into the basic auth itself.

Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-11-06 18:07:22 +00:00
Giteabot 9da92835d1
Fix attachment download bug (#27486) (#27571)
Backport #27486 by @lunny

Fix #27204

This PR allows `/<username>/<reponame>/attachments/<uuid>` access with
personal access token and also changed attachments API download url to
it so it can be download correctly.

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:39:12 +02:00
Giteabot 4e824a735e
Allow get release download files and lfs files with oauth2 token format (#26430) (#27379)
Backport #26430 by @lunny

Fix #26165
Fix #25257

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-01 19:54:11 +08:00
Giteabot fc7d3f7315
Another round of `db.DefaultContext` refactor (#27103) (#27262)
Backport #27103 by @JakobDev

Part of #27065

Co-authored-by: JakobDev <jakobdev@gmx.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2023-09-25 19:24:35 +02:00
silverwind 1b1c55f73f
Increase auth provider icon size on login page (#27122)
Before, 20px:
<img width="474" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-19 at 00 10 05"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/4bed4edb-219d-4844-9d3c-0d747033b09f">

After, 28px:
<img width="576" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-19 at 00 20 40"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/f482ac09-38ae-4c84-80d9-0bd39b7f9772">


Dropdown in account settings is unchanged at 20px:
<img width="157" alt="Screenshot 2023-09-19 at 00 09 11"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/9c998cdf-eeed-4118-9262-664faaa56092">

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-09-19 21:47:13 +00:00
wxiaoguang 8531ca0837
Make SSPI auth mockable (#27036)
Before, the SSPI auth is only complied for Windows, it's difficult to
test and it breaks a lot.

Now, make the SSPI auth mockable and testable.
2023-09-17 23:32:56 +00:00
JakobDev c548dde205
More refactoring of `db.DefaultContext` (#27083)
Next step of #27065
2023-09-15 06:13:19 +00:00
JakobDev 76659b1114
Reduce usage of `db.DefaultContext` (#27073)
Part of #27065

This reduces the usage of `db.DefaultContext`. I think I've got enough
files for the first PR. When this is merged, I will continue working on
this.

Considering how many files this PR affect, I hope it won't take to long
to merge, so I don't end up in the merge conflict hell.

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-09-14 17:09:32 +00:00
KN4CK3R 591f586bf1
Extract auth middleware from service (#27028)
Related #27027

Extract the router logic from `services/auth/middleware.go` into
`routers/web` <-> `routers/common` <-> `routers/api`.
2023-09-12 08:15:16 +02:00
Sven Seeberg 5f7fa27a44
Improve LDAP group config documentation, fixes #21159 (#21227)
Improve the wording of the LDAP group attributes documentation and
expand the examples.
2023-09-05 13:18:53 -04:00
KN4CK3R 0eebeeec90
Remove `Named` interface (#26913)
`Named` is implemented by every `Method` and future implementations
should implement the method too.
2023-09-05 15:58:30 +00:00
Jack Hay c0ab7070e5
Update team invitation email link (#26550)
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com>
2023-08-31 16:26:13 +00:00
KN4CK3R 5315153059
Use `Set[Type]` instead of `map[Type]bool/struct{}`. (#26804) 2023-08-30 06:55:25 +00:00
wxiaoguang c91a7e8dbb
Use `object-fit: contain` for oauth2 custom icons (#26493) 2023-08-14 16:21:04 +00:00
wxiaoguang ed1be4ca68
Handle base64 decoding correctly to avoid panic (#26483)
Fix the panic if the "base64 secret" is too long.
2023-08-14 10:30:16 +00:00
harryzcy 0f9f6567bb
Bump github.com/golang-jwt/jwt to v5 (#25975)
Bumping `github.com/golang-jwt/jwt` from v4 to v5.

`github.com/golang-jwt/jwt` v5 is bringing some breaking changes:

- standard `Valid()` method on claims is removed. It's replaced by
`ClaimsValidator` interface implementing `Validator()` method instead,
which is called after standard validation. Gitea doesn't seem to be
using this logic.
- `jwt.Token` has a field `Valid`, so it's checked in `ParseToken`
function in `services/auth/source/oauth2/token.go`

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-19 09:57:10 +00:00
wxiaoguang 265a28802a
Fix SSPI auth panic (#25955)
Try to fix #25952

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-18 17:32:49 +00:00
caicandong 491cc06ffe
Fix the error message when the token is incorrect (#25701)
we refactored `userIDFromToken` for the token parsing part into a new
function `parseToken`. `parseToken` returns the string `token` from
request, and a boolean `ok` representing whether the token exists or
not. So we can distinguish between token non-existence and token
inconsistency in the `verfity` function, thus solving the problem of no
proper error message when the token is inconsistent.
close #24439  
related #22119

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-07-11 10:04:28 +08:00
silverwind 88f835192d
Replace `interface{}` with `any` (#25686)
Result of running `perl -p -i -e 's#interface\{\}#any#g' **/*` and `make fmt`.

Basically the same [as golang did](2580d0e08d).
2023-07-04 18:36:08 +00:00
Lunny Xiao 0403bd989f
Log the real reason when authentication fails (but don't show the user) (#25414) 2023-07-03 18:39:38 -04:00
Zettat123 a55ff0dd99
Change default email domain for LDAP users (#25425)
Fixes #21169

Change `localhost` to `localhost.local`
2023-06-22 08:16:12 +00:00
Zettat123 33cd74ad70
Fix LDAP sync when Username Attribute is empty (#25278)
Fix #21072

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/96b30beb-7f88-4a60-baae-2e5ad8049555)

Username Attribute is not a required item when creating an
authentication source. If Username Attribute is empty, the username
value of LDAP user cannot be read, so all users from LDAP will be marked
as inactive by mistake when synchronizing external users.

This PR improves the sync logic, if username is empty, the email address
will be used to find user.
2023-06-20 11:04:13 +08:00
wxiaoguang 4e2f1ee58d
Refactor web package and context package (#25298)
1. The "web" package shouldn't depends on "modules/context" package,
instead, let each "web context" register themselves to the "web"
package.
2. The old Init/Free doesn't make sense, so simplify it
* The ctx in "Init(ctx)" is never used, and shouldn't be used that way
* The "Free" is never called and shouldn't be called because the SSPI
instance is shared

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-18 09:59:09 +02:00
silverwind a51b115b0a
Use inline SVG for built-in OAuth providers (#25171)
The plan is that all built-in auth providers use inline SVG for more
flexibility in styling and to get the GitHub icon to follow
`currentcolor`. This only removes the `public/img/auth` directory and
adds the missing svgs to our svg build.

It should map the built-in providers to these SVGs and render them. If
the user has set a Icon URL, it should render that as an `img` tag
instead.

```
gitea-azure-ad
gitea-bitbucket
gitea-discord
gitea-dropbox
gitea-facebook
gitea-gitea
gitea-gitlab
gitea-google
gitea-mastodon
gitea-microsoftonline
gitea-nextcloud
gitea-twitter
gitea-yandex
octicon-mark-github
```

GitHub logo is now white again on dark theme:

<img width="431" alt="Screenshot 2023-06-12 at 21 45 34"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/27a43504-d60a-4132-a502-336b25883e4d">

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-06-13 10:51:02 +00:00
HesterG 63a429581c
Modify OAuth login ui and fix display name, iconurl related logic (#25030)
Close #24808 

Co-Authour @wxiaoguang @silverwind 

1. Most svgs are found from https://worldvectorlogo.com/ , and some are
from conversion of png to svg. (facebook and nextcloud). And also
changed `templates/user/settings/security/accountlinks.tmpl`.

2. Fixed display name and iconurl related logic

# After

<img width="1436" alt="Screen Shot 2023-06-05 at 14 09 05"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/a5db39d8-1ab0-4676-82a4-fba60a1d1f84">

On mobile

<img width="378" alt="Screen Shot 2023-06-05 at 14 09 46"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/71d0f51b-baac-4f48-8ca2-ae0e013bd62e">


user/settings/security/accountlinks (The dropdown might be improved
later)

<img width="973" alt="Screen Shot 2023-06-01 at 10 01 44"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/17645053/27010e7e-2785-4fc5-8c49-b06621898f37">

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-06-08 16:35:29 +00:00
wxiaoguang abcf5a7b5e
Fix install page context, make the install page tests really test (#24858)
Fix #24856

Rename "context.contextKey" to "context.WebContextKey", this context is
for web context only. But the Context itself is not renamed, otherwise
it would cause a lot of changes (if we really want to rename it, there
could be a separate PR).

The old test code doesn't really test, the "install page" gets broken
not only one time, so use new test code to make sure the "install page"
could work.
2023-05-23 09:29:15 +08:00
wxiaoguang 6b33152b7d
Decouple the different contexts from each other (#24786)
Replace #16455

Close #21803

Mixing different Gitea contexts together causes some problems:

1. Unable to respond proper content when error occurs, eg: Web should
respond HTML while API should respond JSON
2. Unclear dependency, eg: it's unclear when Context is used in
APIContext, which fields should be initialized, which methods are
necessary.


To make things clear, this PR introduces a Base context, it only
provides basic Req/Resp/Data features.

This PR mainly moves code. There are still many legacy problems and
TODOs in code, leave unrelated changes to future PRs.
2023-05-21 09:50:53 +08:00
KN4CK3R 9173e079ae
Add Alpine package registry (#23714)
This PR adds an Alpine package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Creating_an_Alpine_package)
to build a *.apk package for testing.

This functionality is similar to the Debian registry (#22854) and
therefore shares some methods. I marked this PR as blocked because it
should be merged after #22854.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/227779595-b76163aa-eea1-4a79-9583-775c24ad74e8.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-12 17:27:50 +00:00
wxiaoguang 0ca5adee16
Do not send "registration success email" for external auth sources (#24632)
Co-author: @pboguslawski 


"registration success email" is only used for notifying a user that "you
have a new account now" when the account is created by admin manually.

When a user uses external auth source, they already knows that they has
the account, so do not send such email.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-10 10:49:47 +00:00
Gary Moon b8c19e7a11
Update LDAP filters to include both username and email address (#24547)
Since the login form label for user_name unconditionally displays
`Username or Email Address` for the `user_name` field, bring matching
LDAP filters to more prominence in the documentation/placeholders.

Signed-off-by: Gary Moon <gary@garymoon.net>
2023-05-05 14:18:53 -04:00
wxiaoguang 5d77691d42
Improve template system and panic recovery (#24461)
Partially for #24457

Major changes:

1. The old `signedUserNameStringPointerKey` is quite hacky, use
`ctx.Data[SignedUser]` instead
2. Move duplicate code from `Contexter` to `CommonTemplateContextData`
3. Remove incorrect copying&pasting code `ctx.Data["Err_Password"] =
true` in API handlers
4. Use one unique `RenderPanicErrorPage` for panic error page rendering
5. Move `stripSlashesMiddleware` to be the first middleware
6. Install global panic recovery handler, it works for both `install`
and `web`
7. Make `500.tmpl` only depend minimal template functions/variables,
avoid triggering new panics

Screenshot:

<details>

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/235444895-cecbabb8-e7dc-4360-a31c-b982d11946a7.png)

</details>
2023-05-04 14:36:34 +08:00
Hester Gong 63a401ac40
Move secrets and runners settings to actions settings (#24200)
This PR moves the secrets and runners settings to actions settings on
all settings(repo,org,user,admin) levels.

After this PR, if
[ENABLED](5e7543fcf4/custom/conf/app.example.ini (L2604))
inside `app.ini` under `[actions]` is set to `false`, the "Actions" tab
(including runners management and secrets management) will not be shown.

After, the settings under actions settings for each level:

1. Admin Level
"Runners Management"
<img width="1437" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-26 at 14 34 20"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/234489731-15822d21-38e1-4560-8bbe-69f122376abc.png">

2. User Level
"Secrets Management"
<img width="1427" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-26 at 14 34 30"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/234489795-68c9c0cb-24f8-4f09-95c6-458ab914c313.png">

3. Repo and Organization Levels
"Runners Management" and "Secrets Management" 
   Org:
<img width="1437" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-26 at 14 35 07"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/234489996-f3af5ebb-d354-46ca-9087-a0b586845281.png">

<img width="1433" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-26 at 14 35 14"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/234490004-3abf8fed-81fd-4ce2-837a-935dade1793d.png">

    Repo:
<img width="1419" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-26 at 14 34 50"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/234489904-80c11038-4b58-462c-9d0b-8b7cf70bc2b3.png">
    
<img width="1430" alt="Screen Shot 2023-04-26 at 14 34 57"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/234489918-4e8d1fe2-9bcd-4d8a-96c1-238a8088d92e.png">

It also finished these tasks :

- [x] rename routers function "runners" to "actions", and refactor
related file names
- [x] check and modify part of the runners related functions to match
their name
- [x] Fix backend check caused by fmt check

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-04-27 20:08:47 -04:00
John Olheiser 5e36024105
Require repo scope for PATs for private repos and basic authentication (#24362)
> The scoped token PR just checked all API routes but in fact, some web
routes like `LFS`, git `HTTP`, container, and attachments supports basic
auth. This PR added scoped token check for them.

---------

Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-04-26 19:24:03 -05:00
Lunny Xiao 5cf7da63ee
Refactor config provider (#24245)
This PR introduces more abstract about `ConfigProvider` and hides more `ini` references.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-04-25 23:06:39 +08:00
KN4CK3R 55a600fa41
Move code from module to service (#24287)
The code should not be in `modules/` but `services/`.

Reference:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24257#discussion_r1174578230
2023-04-23 16:44:05 -04:00
wxiaoguang e422342eeb
Allow adding new files to an empty repo (#24164)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/232561612-2bfcfd0a-fc04-47ba-965f-5d0bcea46c54.png)
2023-04-19 21:40:42 +08:00
techknowlogick 1819c4b59b
Add new user types `reserved`, `bot`, and `remote` (#24026)
This allows for usernames, and emails connected to them to be reserved
and not reused.

Use case, I manage an instance with open registration, and sometimes
when users are deleted for spam (or other purposes), their usernames are
freed up and they sign up again with the same information.

This could also be used to reserve usernames, and block them from being
registered (in case an instance would like to block certain things
without hardcoding the list in code and compiling from scratch).

This is an MVP, that will allow for future work where you can set
something as reserved via the interface.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-04-17 12:36:50 -04:00
wxiaoguang 5b9557aef5
Refactor cookie (#24107)
Close #24062

At the beginning, I just wanted to fix the warning mentioned by #24062

But, the cookie code really doesn't look good to me, so clean up them.

Complete the TODO on `SetCookie`: 

> TODO: Copied from gitea.com/macaron/macaron and should be improved
after macaron removed.
2023-04-13 15:45:33 -04:00
sillyguodong 890d10c7c8
Fix accidental overwriting of LDAP team memberships (#24050)
In the `for` loop, the value of `membershipsToAdd[org]` and
`membershipsToRemove[org]` is a slice that should be appended instead of
overwritten.
Due to the current overwrite, the LDAP group sync only matches the last
group at the moment.

## Example reproduction
- an LDAP user is both a member of
`cn=admin_staff,ou=people,dc=planetexpress,dc=com` and
`cn=ship_crew,ou=people,dc=planetexpress,dc=com`.
- configuration of `Map LDAP groups to Organization teams ` in
`Authentication Sources`:
```json
{
    "cn=admin_staff,ou=people,dc=planetexpress,dc=com":{
        "test_organization":[
            "admin_staff",
            "test_add"
        ]
    },
    "cn=ship_crew,ou=people,dc=planetexpress,dc=com":{
        "test_organization":[
            "ship_crew"
        ]
}
```
- start `Synchronize external user data` task in the `Dashboard`.
- the user was only added for the team `test_organization.ship_crew`
2023-04-11 19:54:26 -04:00
wxiaoguang 8f00979f73
Drop "unrolled/render" package (#23965)
None of the features of `unrolled/render` package is used. 

The Golang builtin "html/template" just works well. Then we can improve
our HTML render to resolve the "$.root.locale.Tr" problem as much as
possible.

Next step: we can have a template render pool (by Clone), then we can
inject global functions with dynamic context to every `Execute` calls.
Then we can use `{{Locale.Tr ....}}` directly in all templates , no need
to pass the `$.root.locale` again and again.
2023-04-08 14:21:50 +08:00
zeripath ed5e7d03c6
Don't apply the group filter when listing LDAP group membership if it is empty (#23745)
When running listLdapGroupMemberships check if the groupFilter is empty
before using it to list memberships.

Fix #23615

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2023-03-29 17:54:36 +08:00
zeripath dad057b639
Handle OpenID discovery URL errors a little nicer when creating/editing sources (#23397)
When there is an error creating a new openIDConnect authentication
source try to handle the error a little better.

Close #23283

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-03-10 01:14:43 -05:00
zeripath 1319ba6742
Use minio/sha256-simd for accelerated SHA256 (#23052)
minio/sha256-simd provides additional acceleration for SHA256 using
AVX512, SHA Extensions for x86 and ARM64 for ARM.

It provides a drop-in replacement for crypto/sha256 and if the
extensions are not available it falls back to standard crypto/sha256.

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-02-22 14:21:46 -05:00
Lunny Xiao bd820aa9c5
Add context cache as a request level cache (#22294)
To avoid duplicated load of the same data in an HTTP request, we can set
a context cache to do that. i.e. Some pages may load a user from a
database with the same id in different areas on the same page. But the
code is hidden in two different deep logic. How should we share the
user? As a result of this PR, now if both entry functions accept
`context.Context` as the first parameter and we just need to refactor
`GetUserByID` to reuse the user from the context cache. Then it will not
be loaded twice on an HTTP request.

But of course, sometimes we would like to reload an object from the
database, that's why `RemoveContextData` is also exposed.

The core context cache is here. It defines a new context
```go
type cacheContext struct {
	ctx  context.Context
	data map[any]map[any]any
        lock sync.RWMutex
}

var cacheContextKey = struct{}{}

func WithCacheContext(ctx context.Context) context.Context {
	return context.WithValue(ctx, cacheContextKey, &cacheContext{
		ctx:  ctx,
		data: make(map[any]map[any]any),
	})
}
```

Then you can use the below 4 methods to read/write/del the data within
the same context.

```go
func GetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any) any
func SetContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key, value any)
func RemoveContextData(ctx context.Context, tp, key any)
func GetWithContextCache[T any](ctx context.Context, cacheGroupKey string, cacheTargetID any, f func() (T, error)) (T, error)
```

Then let's take a look at how `system.GetString` implement it.

```go
func GetSetting(ctx context.Context, key string) (string, error) {
	return cache.GetWithContextCache(ctx, contextCacheKey, key, func() (string, error) {
		return cache.GetString(genSettingCacheKey(key), func() (string, error) {
			res, err := GetSettingNoCache(ctx, key)
			if err != nil {
				return "", err
			}
			return res.SettingValue, nil
		})
	})
}
```

First, it will check if context data include the setting object with the
key. If not, it will query from the global cache which may be memory or
a Redis cache. If not, it will get the object from the database. In the
end, if the object gets from the global cache or database, it will be
set into the context cache.

An object stored in the context cache will only be destroyed after the
context disappeared.
2023-02-15 21:37:34 +08:00
KN4CK3R e8186f1c0f
Map OIDC groups to Orgs/Teams (#21441)
Fixes #19555

Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000

This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.

Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location

I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/195634392-3fc540fc-b229-4649-99ac-91ae8e19df2d.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-08 14:44:42 +08:00
Pavel Ezhov 98770d3db8
Fix group filter for ldap source sync (#22506)
There are 2 separate flows of creating a user: authentication and source
sync.
When a group filter is defined, source sync ignores group filter, while
authentication respects it.
With this PR I've fixed this behavior, so both flows now apply this
filter when searching users in LDAP in a unified way.

- Unified LDAP group membership lookup for authentication and source
sync flows
- Replaced custom group membership lookup (used for authentication flow)
with an existing listLdapGroupMemberships method (used for source sync
flow)
- Modified listLdapGroupMemberships and getUserAttributeListedInGroup in
a way group lookup could be called separately
- Added user filtering based on a group membership for a source sync
- Added tests to cover this logic

Co-authored-by: Pavel Ezhov <paejov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-02 15:45:00 +08:00
Jason Song 4011821c94
Implement actions (#21937)
Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
Chongyi Zheng de484e86bc
Support scoped access tokens (#20908)
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the
design of GitHub OAuth scopes.

The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken`
struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of
scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token`
table in the database.
In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be
used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have
granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope
`all`.
A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the
corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes
to each of the API calls as they fit.


- [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken`
- [x] Add access control to all API endpoints
- [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens
- [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access
to past tokens)

I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release.

Fixes #4300
2023-01-17 15:46:03 -06:00
Jason Song 477a1cc40e
Improve utils of slices (#22379)
- Move the file `compare.go` and `slice.go` to `slice.go`.
- Fix `ExistsInSlice`, it's buggy
  - It uses `sort.Search`, so it assumes that the input slice is sorted.
- It passes `func(i int) bool { return slice[i] == target })` to
`sort.Search`, that's incorrect, check the doc of `sort.Search`.
- Conbine `IsInt64InSlice(int64, []int64)` and `ExistsInSlice(string,
[]string)` to `SliceContains[T]([]T, T)`.
- Conbine `IsSliceInt64Eq([]int64, []int64)` and `IsEqualSlice([]string,
[]string)` to `SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Add `SliceEqual[T]([]T, T)` as a distinction from
`SliceSortedEqual[T]([]T, T)`.
- Redesign `RemoveIDFromList([]int64, int64) ([]int64, bool)` to
`SliceRemoveAll[T]([]T, T) []T`.
- Add `SliceContainsFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` and
`SliceRemoveAllFunc[T]([]T, func(T) bool)` for general use.
- Add comments to explain why not `golang.org/x/exp/slices`.
- Add unit tests.
2023-01-11 13:31:16 +08:00