Commit Graph

90 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zettat123 e7c2231dee
Support for status check pattern (#24633)
This PR is to allow users to specify status checks by patterns. Users
can enter patterns in the "Status Check Pattern" `textarea` to match
status checks and each line specifies a pattern. If "Status Check" is
enabled, patterns cannot be empty and user must enter at least one
pattern.
Users will no longer be able to choose status checks from the table. But
a __*`Matched`*__ mark will be added to the matched checks to help users
enter patterns.

Benefits:
- Even if no status checks have been completed, users can specify
necessary status checks in advance.
- More flexible. Users can specify a series of status checks by one
pattern.

Before:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/635738ad-580c-49cd-941d-c721e5b99be4)

After:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/16aa7b1b-abf1-4170-9bfa-ae6fc9803a82)

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-05-17 16:11:13 +08:00
KN4CK3R 5968c63a11
Add Go package registry (#24687)
Fixes #7608

This PR adds a Go package registry usable with the Go proxy protocol.

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/328feb5c-3df2-4f9d-8eae-fe3126d14c37)
2023-05-14 23:38:40 +08:00
KN4CK3R 9173e079ae
Add Alpine package registry (#23714)
This PR adds an Alpine package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Creating_an_Alpine_package)
to build a *.apk package for testing.

This functionality is similar to the Debian registry (#22854) and
therefore shares some methods. I marked this PR as blocked because it
should be merged after #22854.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/227779595-b76163aa-eea1-4a79-9583-775c24ad74e8.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-12 17:27:50 +00:00
KN4CK3R 05209f0d1d
Add RPM registry (#23380)
Fixes #20751

This PR adds a RPM package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://opensource.com/article/18/9/how-build-rpm-packages) to
build a *.rpm package for testing.

This functionality is similar to the Debian registry (#22854) and
therefore shares some methods. I marked this PR as blocked because it
should be merged after #22854.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/223806549-d8784fd9-9d79-46a2-9ae2-f038594f636a.png)
2023-05-05 20:33:37 +00:00
KN4CK3R bf999e4069
Add Debian package registry (#24426)
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny

This PR adds a Debian package registry.
You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package) to build
a *.deb package for testing.
Source packages are not supported at the moment and I did not find
documentation of the architecture "all" and how these packages should be
treated.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/218126879-eb80a866-775c-4c8e-8529-5797203a64e6.png)

Part of #20751.

Revised copy of #22854.

---------

Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-02 12:31:35 -04:00
Yarden Shoham c0ddec8a2a
Revert "Add Debian package registry" (#24412)
Reverts go-gitea/gitea#22854
2023-04-28 18:06:41 -04:00
KN4CK3R bf77e2163b
Add Debian package registry (#22854)
Co-authored-by: @awkwardbunny

This PR adds a Debian package registry. You can follow [this
tutorial](https://www.baeldung.com/linux/create-debian-package) to build
a *.deb package for testing. Source packages are not supported at the
moment and I did not find documentation of the architecture "all" and
how these packages should be treated.

---------

Co-authored-by: Brian Hong <brian@hongs.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-04-28 17:51:36 -04:00
Zettat123 ed7245f997
Title can be empty when creating tag only (#23917)
Fixes #23809

Make the title not required. If the title is empty when creating release
(not tag), an error message will be displayed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/229761056-c52e338b-5f25-4d7d-bb44-2cb0304abcee.png)
2023-04-06 21:44:52 -04:00
KN4CK3R c709fa17a7
Add Swift package registry (#22404)
This PR adds a [Swift](https://www.swift.org/) package registry.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/211842523-07521cbd-8fb6-400f-820c-ee8048b05ae8.png)
2023-03-13 15:28:39 -05:00
wxiaoguang 188c8c12c2
Make Ctrl+Enter submit a pending comment (starting review) instead of submitting a single comment (#23245)
Close #23241

Before: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, a single comment will
be added.

After: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, start the review with
pending comments.


The old name `is_review` is not clear, so the new code use
`pending_review` as the new name.

Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-03-04 02:13:37 -05:00
Jason Song c8c2a31818
Add force_merge to merge request and fix checking mergable (#23010)
Fix #23000.
2023-02-21 08:42:07 -06:00
Zettat123 9a83aa28a3
Get rules by id when editing branch protection rule (#22932)
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with
the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276442-d3c001ad-e693-44ec-9ad2-b33f2666b49b.png)

---

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276478-547c3b93-b3f1-4292-a1ef-c1b7747fe1bb.png)

The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get
branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When
the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it
will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the
bug, the function should get rule by id first.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 19:30:41 +08:00
Brecht Van Lommel 6221a6fd54
Scoped labels (#22585)
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.

The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.

Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.

In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.

Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:

* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.

Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:

* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.

Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:

* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.

---------

Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
2023-02-18 21:17:39 +02:00
Brecht Van Lommel 49919c636e
Pull Requests: setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, tweak UI (#22862)
Add setting to allow edits by maintainers by default, to avoid having to
often ask contributors to enable this.

This also reorganizes the pull request settings UI to improve clarity.
It was unclear which checkbox options were there to control available
merge styles and which merge styles they correspond to.

Now there is a "Merge Styles" label followed by the merge style options
with the same name as in other menus. The remaining checkboxes were
moved to the bottom, ordered rougly by typical order of operations.

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-13 14:09:52 +08:00
Nathaniel Sabanski fb1a2a13f0
Preview images for Issue cards in Project Board view (#22112)
Original Issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22102

This addition would be a big benefit for design and art teams using the
issue tracking.

The preview will be the latest "image type" attachments on an issue-
simple, and allows for automatic updates of the cover image as issue
progress is made!

This would make Gitea competitive with Trello... wouldn't it be amazing
to say goodbye to Atlassian products? Ha.

First image is the most recent, the SQL will fetch up to 5 latest images
(URL string).

All images supported by browsers plus upcoming formats: *.avif *.bmp
*.gif *.jpg *.jpeg *.jxl *.png *.svg *.webp

The CSS will try to center-align images until it cannot, then it will
left align with overflow hidden. Single images get to be slightly
larger!

Tested so far on: Chrome, Firefox, Android Chrome, Android Firefox.

Current revision with light and dark themes:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066878-58e6bf73-0c93-4caa-8d40-38f4432b3578.png)


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/24665/207066555-293f65c3-e706-4888-8516-de8ec632d638.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-02-11 16:12:41 +08:00
KN4CK3R e8186f1c0f
Map OIDC groups to Orgs/Teams (#21441)
Fixes #19555

Test-Instructions:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21441#issuecomment-1419438000

This PR implements the mapping of user groups provided by OIDC providers
to orgs teams in Gitea. The main part is a refactoring of the existing
LDAP code to make it usable from different providers.

Refactorings:
- Moved the router auth code from module to service because of import
cycles
- Changed some model methods to take a `Context` parameter
- Moved the mapping code from LDAP to a common location

I've tested it with Keycloak but other providers should work too. The
JSON mapping format is the same as for LDAP.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/195634392-3fc540fc-b229-4649-99ac-91ae8e19df2d.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-08 14:44:42 +08:00
KN4CK3R d987ac6bf1
Add Chef package registry (#22554)
This PR implements a [Chef registry](https://chef.io/) to manage
cookbooks. This package type was a bit complicated because Chef uses RSA
signed requests as authentication with the registry.


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213747995-46819fd8-c3d6-45a2-afd4-a4c3c8505a4a.png)


![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/213748145-d01c9e81-d4dd-41e3-a3cc-8241862c3166.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-06 09:49:21 +08:00
KN4CK3R df789d962b
Add Cargo package registry (#21888)
This PR implements a [Cargo registry](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/)
to manage Rust packages. This package type was a little bit more
complicated because Cargo needs an additional Git repository to store
its package index.

Screenshots:

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102004-08d812ac-c066-4969-9bda-2fed818554eb.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102141-d9970f14-dca6-4174-b17a-50ba1bd79087.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/203102244-dc05743b-78b6-4d97-998e-ef76341a978f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-05 18:12:31 +08:00
KN4CK3R 6ba9ff7b48
Add Conda package registry (#22262)
This PR adds a [Conda](https://conda.io/) package registry.
2023-02-01 12:30:39 -06:00
Brecht Van Lommel faa96553d1
Add repository setting to enable/disable releases unit (#22671)
To go along with similar settings for issues, pulls, projects, packages.
2023-02-01 01:31:19 +00:00
Jason Song 4011821c94
Implement actions (#21937)
Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00
Chongyi Zheng de484e86bc
Support scoped access tokens (#20908)
This PR adds the support for scopes of access tokens, mimicking the
design of GitHub OAuth scopes.

The changes of the core logic are in `models/auth` that `AccessToken`
struct will have a `Scope` field. The normalized (no duplication of
scope), comma-separated scope string will be stored in `access_token`
table in the database.
In `services/auth`, the scope will be stored in context, which will be
used by `reqToken` middleware in API calls. Only OAuth2 tokens will have
granular token scopes, while others like BasicAuth will default to scope
`all`.
A large amount of work happens in `routers/api/v1/api.go` and the
corresponding `tests/integration` tests, that is adding necessary scopes
to each of the API calls as they fit.


- [x] Add `Scope` field to `AccessToken`
- [x] Add access control to all API endpoints
- [x] Update frontend & backend for when creating tokens
- [x] Add a database migration for `scope` column (enable 'all' access
to past tokens)

I'm aiming to complete it before Gitea 1.19 release.

Fixes #4300
2023-01-17 15:46:03 -06:00
Lunny Xiao 2782c14396
Supports wildcard protected branch (#20825)
This PR introduce glob match for protected branch name. The separator is
`/` and you can use `*` matching non-separator chars and use `**` across
separator.

It also supports input an exist or non-exist branch name as matching
condition and branch name condition has high priority than glob rule.

Should fix #2529 and #15705

screenshots

<img width="1160" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/205651179-ebb5492a-4ade-4bb4-a13c-965e8c927063.png">

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2023-01-16 16:00:22 +08:00
Jason Song 659055138b
Secrets storage with SecretKey encrypted (#22142)
Fork of #14483, but [gave up
MasterKey](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/14483#issuecomment-1350728557),
and fixed some problems.

Close #12065.
Needed by #13539.

Featrues:
- Secrets for repo and org, not user yet.
- Use SecretKey to encrypte/encrypt secrets.
- Trim spaces of secret value.
- Add a new locale ini block, to make it easy to support secrets for
user.

Snapshots:

Repo level secrets:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823319-b8a4903f-38ca-4af7-9d05-336a5af906f3.png)

Rrg level secrets

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/207823371-8bd02e93-1928-40d1-8c76-f48b255ace36.png)

Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
2022-12-20 17:07:13 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 003b4e209c
Allow disable code tab (#20805)
I know some users created a repository in an organization but just use
issues and projects to handle the whole organizations issues. So that
`Code` could be disabled per repository.

<img width="1148" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792075-346cb508-b620-4adb-bc9a-cba76fdcb294.png">

It could also become a wiki repository.

<img width="1173" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/81045/184792324-e15c6f68-35c0-4105-ab77-83585ce53672.png">

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-12-12 13:29:27 +08:00
Jason Song f59a74852b
Update gitea-vet to check FSFE REUSE (#22004)
Related to:
- #21840
- https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-vet/pulls/21

What it looks like when it's working:
https://drone.gitea.io/go-gitea/gitea/64040/1/5

All available SPDX license identifiers: [SPDX License
List](https://spdx.org/licenses/).

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-12-02 22:14:57 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
Xinyu Zhou 68e934ab5d
Add option to enable CAPTCHA validation for login (#21638)
Enable this to require captcha validation for user login. You also must
enable `ENABLE_CAPTCHA`.

Summary:
- Consolidate CAPTCHA template
- add CAPTCHA handle and context
- add `REQUIRE_CAPTCHA_FOR_LOGIN` config and docs
- Consolidate CAPTCHA set-up and verification code 

Partially resolved #6049 

Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhou <i@sourcehut.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2022-11-22 21:13:18 +00:00
KN4CK3R 32db62515f
Add package registry cleanup rules (#21658)
Fixes #20514
Fixes #20766
Fixes #20631

This PR adds Cleanup Rules for the package registry. This allows to
delete unneeded packages automatically. Cleanup rules can be set up from
the user or org settings.
Please have a look at the documentation because I'm not a native english
speaker.

Rule Form

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330792-c13918a6-e196-4e71-9f53-18554515edca.png)

Rule List

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199331261-5f6878e8-a80c-4985-800d-ebb3524b1a8d.png)

Rule Preview

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/199330917-c95e4017-cf64-4142-a3e4-af18c4f127c3.png)

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-20 16:08:38 +02:00
wxiaoguang fb704f6c72
Revert unrelated changes for SMTP auth (#21767)
The purpose of #18982 is to improve the SMTP mailer, but there were some
unrelated changes made to the SMTP auth in
d60c438694

This PR reverts these unrelated changes, fix #21744
2022-11-10 16:12:23 -05:00
wxiaoguang 2900dc90a7
Improve valid user name check (#20136)
Close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/21640

Before: Gitea can create users like ".xxx" or "x..y", which is not
ideal, it's already a consensus that dot filenames have special
meanings, and `a..b` is a confusing name when doing cross repo compare.

After: stricter

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-04 17:04:08 +08:00
oliverpool b6e81357bd
Add Webhook authorization header (#20926)
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_

## Context

In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:

- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)

## Proposed solution

Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).

This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.

As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):


![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png)

The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.

## Questions

- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind 
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~

## Done as well:

- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there


_Closes #19872_

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 20:23:20 +02:00
Gusted c2d2323fc8
Configure update checker on installation page (#21655)
- I recently became aware that this was enabled by-default, I don't
necessary agree with that and this should rather be configured by the
user(this patch does that on the installation page) as it connects to a
homeserver, which I'd prefer to avoid on my instance.


![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/25481501/199260613-a77a1b10-347a-4542-8982-9b9b24dad28c.png)
2022-11-01 19:23:56 +00:00
M Hickford 191a74d622
Record OAuth client type at registration (#21316)
The OAuth spec [defines two types of
client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1),
confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be
confidential.

> OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate
securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to
>   maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials):
>
>   confidential
> Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with
> restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure
client authentication using other means.
>
>   **public
> Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their
credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource
owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based
application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any
other means.**
>
> The client type designation is based on the authorization server's
definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels
of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make
assumptions about the client type.

 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4

> Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client
registration details in order to identify and process requests
accordingly.

Require PKCE for public clients:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1

> Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native
apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message

Fixes #21299

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-24 15:59:24 +08:00
JakobDev 8351172b6e
Limit length of repo description and repo url input fields (#21119)
Both allow only limited characters. If you input more, you will get a error
message. So it make sense to limit the characters of the input fields.

Slightly relax the MaxSize of repo's Description and Website
2022-09-16 15:19:16 +08:00
JakobDev bf325d4412
Keep path when creating a new branch (#21153)
If you are create a new new branch while viewing file or directory, you
get redirected to the root of the repo. With this PR, you keep your
current path instead of getting redirected to the repo root.
2022-09-15 21:25:16 +08:00
Aaron F 3963625b6e
Webhook for Wiki changes (#20219)
Add support for triggering webhook notifications on wiki changes.

This PR contains frontend and backend for webhook notifications on wiki actions (create a new page, rename a page, edit a page and delete a page). The frontend got a new checkbox under the Custom Event -> Repository Events section. There is only one checkbox for create/edit/rename/delete actions, because it makes no sense to separate it and others like releases or packages follow the same schema.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018803-26851196-831f-4fde-9a4c-9e639b0e0d6b.png)

The actions itself are separated, so that different notifications will be executed (with the "action" field). All the webhook receivers implement the new interface method (Wiki) and the corresponding tests.

When implementing this, I encounter a little bug on editing a wiki page. Creating and editing a wiki page is technically the same action and will be handled by the ```updateWikiPage``` function. But the function need to know if it is a new wiki page or just a change. This distinction is done by the ```action``` parameter, but this will not be sent by the frontend (on form submit). This PR will fix this by adding the ```action``` parameter with the values ```_new``` or ```_edit```, which will be used by the ```updateWikiPage``` function.

I've done integration tests with matrix and gitea (http).

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018795-eb5cdc01-9ba3-483e-a6b7-ed0e313a71fb.png)

Fix #16457

Signed-off-by: Aaron Fischer <mail@aaron-fischer.net>
2022-09-04 20:54:23 +01:00
oliverpool c81b26b0e5
refactor webhook *NewPost (#20729)
* refactor webhook *NewPost

* remove empty values

* always show errs.Message

* remove utils.IsValidSlackChannel

* move IsValidSlackChannel to services/webhook package

* binding: handle empty Message case

* make IsValidSlackChannel more strict
2022-08-11 17:48:23 +02:00
Gusted 58de07e5fd
Add support mCaptcha as captcha provider (#20458)
https://mcaptcha.org/

Co-authored-by: Felipe Leopoldo Sologuren Gutiérrez <fsologureng@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-08-10 15:20:10 +02:00
Clar Fon 036dd8a788
Rework mailer settings (#18982)
* `PROTOCOL`: can be smtp, smtps, smtp+startls, smtp+unix, sendmail, dummy
* `SMTP_ADDR`: domain for SMTP, or path to unix socket
* `SMTP_PORT`: port for SMTP; defaults to 25 for `smtp`, 465 for `smtps`, and 587 for `smtp+startls`
* `ENABLE_HELO`, `HELO_HOSTNAME`: reverse `DISABLE_HELO` to `ENABLE_HELO`; default to false + system hostname
* `FORCE_TRUST_SERVER_CERT`: replace the unclear `SKIP_VERIFY`
* `CLIENT_CERT_FILE`, `CLIENT_KEY_FILE`, `USE_CLIENT_CERT`: clarify client certificates here

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-08-02 13:24:18 +08:00
Chongyi Zheng 49f9d43afe
Implement sync push mirror on commit (#19411)
Support synchronizing with the push mirrors whenever new commits are pushed or synced from pull mirror.

Related Issues: #18220

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-07-08 20:45:12 +01:00
Lunny Xiao 1a9821f57a
Move issues related files into models/issues (#19931)
* Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access

* fix test

* fix git test

* Move functions sequence

* Some improvements per @KN4CK3R and @delvh

* Move issues related code to models/issues

* Move some issues related sub package

* Merge

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Rename some files
2022-06-13 17:37:59 +08:00
Gusted edf14202fe
Unify repo settings & show better error (#19828)
* Unify context data
* Actually show invalid url in error
2022-06-12 13:43:27 +08:00
Sandro Santilli 52c2e82813
Custom regexp external issues (#17624)
* Implement custom regular expression for external issue tracking.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Beyn <malex@fatelectrons.org>

* Fix syntax/style

* Update repo.go

* Set metas['regexp']

* gofmt

* fix some tests

* fix more tests

* refactor frontend

* use LRU cache for regexp

* Update modules/markup/html_internal_test.go

Co-authored-by: Alexander Beyn <malex@fatelectrons.org>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-06-10 13:39:53 +08:00
wxiaoguang cc7236e852
Make Ctrl+Enter (quick submit) work for issue comment and wiki editor (#19729)
* Make Ctrl+Enter (quick submit) work for issue comment and wiki editor

* Remove the required `SubmitReviewForm.Type`, empty type (triggered by quick submit) means "comment"

* Merge duplicate code
2022-05-20 04:26:04 +02:00
Lunny Xiao d4834071da
Repository level enable package or disable (#19323) 2022-05-08 17:51:50 +02:00
Lunny Xiao 4344a64107
Allow custom default merge message with .gitea/default_merge_message/<merge_style>_TEMPLATE.md (#18177)
* Allow custom default merge message with .gitea/MERGE_MESSAGE_<merge_style>_TEMPLATE.md

* Some improvements

* Follow some advices

* Fix bug

* Fix bug

* Fix lint

* Fix close comment

* Fix test

* Fix and docs

* Improve codes

* Update docs and remove unnecessary variables

* return error for GetDefaultMergeMessage

* Fix test

* improve code

* ignore unknow unit type

* return error for GetDefaultMergeMessage

* Update services/pull/merge.go

* Some improvements

* Follow some advices

* Fix bug

* Fix lint

* Improve codes

* Update docs and remove unnecessary variables

* return error for GetDefaultMergeMessage

* improve code

* Handle deleted HeadRepo in GetDefaultMergeMessage

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

* Fix test

* Fix test

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2022-05-08 20:32:45 +08:00
kolaente 59b30f060a
Auto merge pull requests when all checks succeeded via API (#9307)
* Fix indention

Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>

* Add option to merge a pr right now without waiting for the checks to succeed

Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>

* Fix lint

Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>

* Add scheduled pr merge to tables used for testing

Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>

* Add status param to make GetPullRequestByHeadBranch reusable

Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>

* Move "Merge now" to a seperate button to make the ui clearer

Signed-off-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>

* Update models/scheduled_pull_request_merge.go

Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>

* Update web_src/js/index.js

Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>

* Update web_src/js/index.js

Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>

* Re-add migration after merge

* Fix frontend lint

* Fix version compare

* Add vendored dependencies

* Add basic tets

* Make sure the api route is capable of scheduling PRs for merging

* Fix comparing version

* make vendor

* adopt refactor

* apply suggestion: User -> Doer

* init var once

* Fix Test

* Update templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl

* adopt

* nits

* next

* code format

* lint

* use same name schema; rm CreateUnScheduledPRToAutoMergeComment

* API: can not create schedule twice

* Add TestGetBranchNamesForSha

* nits

* new go routine for each pull to merge

* Update models/pull.go

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

* Update models/scheduled_pull_request_merge.go

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

* fix & add renaming sugestions

* Update services/automerge/pull_auto_merge.go

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>

* fix conflict relicts

* apply latest refactors

* fix: migration after merge

* Update models/error.go

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* Update options/locale/locale_en-US.ini

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* adapt latest refactors

* fix test

* use more context

* skip potential edgecases

* document func usage

* GetBranchNamesForSha() -> GetRefsBySha()

* start refactoring

* ajust to new changes

* nit

* docu nit

* the great check move

* move checks for branchprotection into own package

* resolve todo now ...

* move & rename

* unexport if posible

* fix

* check if merge is allowed before merge on scheduled pull

* debugg

* wording

* improve SetDefaults & nits

* NotAllowedToMerge -> DisallowedToMerge

* fix test

* merge files

* use package "errors"

* merge files

* add string names

* other implementation for gogit

* adapt refactor

* more context for models/pull.go

* GetUserRepoPermission use context

* more ctx

* use context for loading pull head/base-repo

* more ctx

* more ctx

* models.LoadIssueCtx()

* models.LoadIssueCtx()

* Handle pull_service.Merge in one DB transaction

* add TODOs

* next

* next

* next

* more ctx

* more ctx

* Start refactoring structure of old pull code ...

* move code into new packages

* shorter names ... and finish **restructure**

* Update models/branches.go

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>

* finish UpdateProtectBranch

* more and fix

* update datum

* template: use "svg" helper

* rename prQueue 2 prPatchCheckerQueue

* handle automerge in queue

* lock pull on git&db actions ...

* lock pull on git&db actions ...

* add TODO notes

* the regex

* transaction in tests

* GetRepositoryByIDCtx

* shorter table name and lint fix

* close transaction bevore notify

* Update models/pull.go

* next

* CheckPullMergable check all branch protections!

* Update routers/web/repo/pull.go

* CheckPullMergable check all branch protections!

* Revert "PullService lock via pullID (#19520)" (for now...)

This reverts commit 6cde7c9159a5ea75a10356feb7b8c7ad4c434a9a.

* Update services/pull/check.go

* Use for a repo action one database transaction

* Apply suggestions from code review

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* Update services/issue/status.go

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* Update services/issue/status.go

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* use db.WithTx()

* gofmt

* make pr.GetDefaultMergeMessage() context aware

* make MergePullRequestForm.SetDefaults context aware

* use db.WithTx()

* pull.SetMerged only with context

* fix deadlock in `test-sqlite\#TestAPIBranchProtection`

* dont forget templates

* db.WithTx allow to set the parentCtx

* handle db transaction in service packages but not router

* issue_service.ChangeStatus just had caused another deadlock :/
it has to do something with how notification package is handled

* if we merge a pull in one database transaktion, we get a lock, because merge infoce internal api that cant handle open db sessions to the same repo

* ajust to current master

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* dont open db transaction in router

* make generate-swagger

* one _success less

* wording nit

* rm

* adapt

* remove not needed test files

* rm less diff & use attr in JS

* ...

* Update services/repository/files/commit.go

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>

* ajust db schema for PullAutoMerge

* skip broken pull refs

* more context in error messages

* remove webUI part for another pull

* remove more WebUI only parts

* API: add CancleAutoMergePR

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>

* fix lint

* Apply suggestions from code review

* cancle -> cancel

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* change queue identifyer

* fix swagger

* prevent nil issue

* fix and dont drop error

* as per @zeripath

* Update integrations/git_test.go

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* Update integrations/git_test.go

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>

* more declarative integration tests (dedup code)

* use assert.False/True helper

Co-authored-by: 赵智超 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-05-08 01:05:52 +08:00
6543 92f139d091
Use for a repo action one database transaction (#19576)
... more context

(part of #9307)
2022-05-03 21:46:28 +02:00
qwerty287 8eb1cd9264
Add "Allow edits from maintainer" feature (#18002)
Adds a feature [like GitHub has](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork) (step 7).
If you create a new PR from a forked repo, you can select (and change later, but only if you are the PR creator/poster) the "Allow edits from maintainers" option.
Then users with write access to the base branch get more permissions on this branch:
* use the update pull request button
* push directly from the command line (`git push`)
* edit/delete/upload files via web UI
* use related API endpoints

You can't merge PRs to this branch with this enabled, you'll need "full" code write permissions.

This feature has a pretty big impact on the permission system. I might forgot changing some things or didn't find security vulnerabilities. In this case, please leave a review or comment on this PR.

Closes #17728

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2022-04-28 17:45:33 +02:00